
What we use narrative therapy for
What a narrative therapy session actually looks like
You and your therapist look at the story you've been telling about what happened to you, and about who that makes you. Then you go looking for the parts of your life that don't fit that story: the exceptions, the moments it doesn't explain.
The problem gets talked about as separate from you, not as who you are. "The depression" rather than "I am depressed." That's not a semantic trick. It's the difference between fighting yourself and fighting something you're carrying, and it changes what feels possible to work on.
Why the externalizing language stays. This is narrative therapy's actual mechanism, not a marketing flourish, and it's the part most likely to make a skeptical reader understand why this is different from "just talk about it and feel better."
When narrative therapy, and when something else
Narrative therapy fits when the problem has stopped feeling like something that happened to you and started feeling like who you are. It's especially useful when you've been carrying a label, a diagnosis, or a story for long enough that you can't remember a version of yourself without it.
CBT fits better when you want structured tools for a specific, nameable pattern.
IFS fits when the experience feels less like one story and more like different parts of you pulling in different directions.
Most people end up with a blend, and the blend changes as you do. If you're not sure which describes you, that's genuinely fine. Working that out is what the first two sessions are for.
You are not the story you've been told
Tell us what's been weighing on you, and we'll work out together whether narrative therapy is the right way in.






